<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mike Rowse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikerowse.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikerowse.com</link>
	<description>A voice from New Mexico</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:05:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on MMMM Bacon; with a side of stupidity by contour abs</title>
		<link>http://mikerowse.com/?p=1618&#038;cpage=1#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>contour abs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 13:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikerowse.com/?p=1618#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Good  points…I would note that as someone who really doesn’t comment to  blogs much (in fact, this may be my first post), I don’t think the term “lurker” is very  becoming to a non-posting reader. It’s not your fault  really , but perhaps the blogosphere could come up with a better, non-creepy name for the 90% of us that enjoy reading  the content .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good  points…I would note that as someone who really doesn’t comment to  blogs much (in fact, this may be my first post), I don’t think the term “lurker” is very  becoming to a non-posting reader. It’s not your fault  really , but perhaps the blogosphere could come up with a better, non-creepy name for the 90% of us that enjoy reading  the content .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on That&#8217;s some fine police work by Mario Time Attack</title>
		<link>http://mikerowse.com/?p=1572&#038;cpage=1#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Time Attack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikerowse.com/?p=1572#comment-430</guid>
		<description>Very good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pure unadulterated stupidity by Diane Hutson</title>
		<link>http://mikerowse.com/?p=1594&#038;cpage=1#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane Hutson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikerowse.com/?p=1594#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Southern Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords&#039; opponents have stooped too low this time. While American soldiers are on the battlefield risking their lives for this country, Giffords&#039; campaign opposition is making up lies and distortions about the dangers they face - just to win an election. 

At a House Armed Services Committee hearing in June, Giffords  asked Gen. David Petraeus about the military&#039;s policy of reducing fuel consumption in war zones. Why did she ask about that? Because reducing fuel consumption and maintaining a stable electrical supply are part of the military&#039;s plan to protect our troops from the dangerous work of guarding fuel supply convoys.

But Giffords&#039; opponents are smearing this hearing to score political points. They are pretending that she questioned Gen. Petreaus about bayoneting the enemy to reduce carbon emissions putting solar panels on Humvees. These false accusations are beneath contempt.  They disrespect our brave servicemen and women who are putting their lives on the line for our country. 

Here are the facts:

Fact: Fuel consumption and transportation are major security threats for our troops. One hundred and seventy servicemembers lost their lives in 2007 alone guarding and transporting fuel.

Fact: Our enemy, Osama bin Laden, has called oil our military’s “umbilical cord” and tells his terrorist followers to “focus your operations on oil, especially in Iraq and the Gulf area, since this will cause the [Americans] to die off.”

Fact: Military leaders agree: The more fuel our military consumes, the more vulnerable we are to attacks on fuel convoys and to roadside IEDs. When we reduce our dependence on fuel, we reduce the number of troops killed delivering gas.

Fact: Rep. Giffords did NOT ask General Petraeus about carbon emissions, global warming or the environment. She asked him about his policy on fuel consumption and maintaining a stable electrical supply, which he called for in his 2006 Counterinsurgency Strategy.

For more information, here is what the nonpartisan Snopes.com has to say about this smear campaign:http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/giffords.asp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Southern Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords&#8217; opponents have stooped too low this time. While American soldiers are on the battlefield risking their lives for this country, Giffords&#8217; campaign opposition is making up lies and distortions about the dangers they face &#8211; just to win an election. </p>
<p>At a House Armed Services Committee hearing in June, Giffords  asked Gen. David Petraeus about the military&#8217;s policy of reducing fuel consumption in war zones. Why did she ask about that? Because reducing fuel consumption and maintaining a stable electrical supply are part of the military&#8217;s plan to protect our troops from the dangerous work of guarding fuel supply convoys.</p>
<p>But Giffords&#8217; opponents are smearing this hearing to score political points. They are pretending that she questioned Gen. Petreaus about bayoneting the enemy to reduce carbon emissions putting solar panels on Humvees. These false accusations are beneath contempt.  They disrespect our brave servicemen and women who are putting their lives on the line for our country. </p>
<p>Here are the facts:</p>
<p>Fact: Fuel consumption and transportation are major security threats for our troops. One hundred and seventy servicemembers lost their lives in 2007 alone guarding and transporting fuel.</p>
<p>Fact: Our enemy, Osama bin Laden, has called oil our military’s “umbilical cord” and tells his terrorist followers to “focus your operations on oil, especially in Iraq and the Gulf area, since this will cause the [Americans] to die off.”</p>
<p>Fact: Military leaders agree: The more fuel our military consumes, the more vulnerable we are to attacks on fuel convoys and to roadside IEDs. When we reduce our dependence on fuel, we reduce the number of troops killed delivering gas.</p>
<p>Fact: Rep. Giffords did NOT ask General Petraeus about carbon emissions, global warming or the environment. She asked him about his policy on fuel consumption and maintaining a stable electrical supply, which he called for in his 2006 Counterinsurgency Strategy.</p>
<p>For more information, here is what the nonpartisan Snopes.com has to say about this smear campaign:http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/giffords.asp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pure unadulterated stupidity by Marie Norton</title>
		<link>http://mikerowse.com/?p=1594&#038;cpage=1#comment-426</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikerowse.com/?p=1594#comment-426</guid>
		<description>Mike, actually you can make up stupidity like this. Because this is made up. Its an urban legend started by someone who is running against Giffords. This was totally debunked by Snopes (http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/giffords.asp). Do your research, Mike. Its 2010, we have this thing called the internet and its friend google. I&#039;d expect a BLOGGER to know about them.  But don&#039;t believe me, here&#039;s the transcript. In case you wont believe even that, here is the committee hearing webpage. the hearing was on June 16. you can watch the webcast: http://armedservices.house.gov/hearing_information.shtml. I hope you&#039;ll publish a correction now that you know the truth!

GIFFORDS:

    Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman.

    General Petraeus, welcome back to committee.

    And, Madam Secretary, thank you, as well.

    Hailing from southern Arizona, I&#039;m glad you&#039;re staying hydrated. It&#039;s very important, something that we know out in the desert. And on behalf of the men and women of Fort Huachuca and Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, we just want to thank both of you for your service.

    And, unfortunately, we lost two of our airmen, actually, associated with Davis-Monthan, Senior Airman Benjamin White, who was 24, and also Tech Sergeant Michael Paul Flores, 31, were both based at Davis-Monthan and were part of the Rescue Command. Very sad. Very much brings home, you know, what we&#039;re asking of our men and women.

    There&#039;s been a lot of attention back here in the United States on what&#039;s happening with the BP oil spill. And as we all know, the largest user of energy on the planet is actually the United States Air Force. And the DOD is the largest user of energy in the United States.

    And I really want to commend the work done on behalf of DOD and also what&#039;s happening in the field with our energy. But it&#039;s an area that I just really want to focus on, and I know a lot of questions have been asked, but during the last three years, supply lines have increasingly threatened -- have been threatened either by enemy action or through international places.

    And in places like Kandahar, where we have a large presence, we have been plugged into a very unsustainable and really incapable grid system. We know that a major part of the upcoming Kandahar offensive will include some serious repairs and upgrades to the energy system, which will include small-scale solar and hydropower systems, and also some solar-powered streetlights.

    I&#039;m just curious whether or not there&#039;s plans to utilize any of those same technologies at our bases around Afghanistan. And wouldn&#039;t that greatly reduce our need for fuel?


PETRAEUS:

    I pause, because there are a couple of different components to what we&#039;re trying to do with respect to energy reduction, if you will, and that&#039;s really what it is about. And there&#039;s, again, a fairly comprehensive effort in that regard.

    We don&#039;t have hydropower, obviously, access to that on the bases, but there has been a significant effort which has reduced very substantially, actually, what we&#039;ve needed for the cooling and heating of our workplaces and living places. And that is sometimes as simple as pumping extra insulation into the roof and walls of these fairly rudimentary temporary buildings that we have, sometimes even the tents.

    And it&#039;s interesting, because we were exchanging e-mails today with an individual who&#039;s involved in that effort, and we believe there have been actually billions of dollars of savings in this effort, if you look at what we did in Iraq first in that regard, and have now been pursuing in Afghanistan.

    If I could, I might note that the supply lines actually have worked well -- the lines of communication through Pakistan. Yes, there periodically are attacks, and there was one a week ago, but that followed a period of months and months, if not a year or so, since the last significant attacks. And it&#039;s much less than 1 percent of all of the cargo that goes in through Pakistan that is affected by these various attacks.

    And we&#039;re up now to some 70 percent of all supplies, not necessarily all materiel, but all supplies coming through the north through this carefully constructed northern distribution network that we&#039;ve been able to establish over the course of the last year, in close partnership with U.S. Transportation Command and the State Department, that enables us to bring items through Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and into Afghanistan, and then even through some of the other countries, there are other routes, including one that comes out of Iraq through Turkey and then turns east.

    And we do use solar power in some cases, again, where that provides a benefit to us. We did that in Iraq, as well, by the way, I might point out, quite considerable use of that. And, again, that&#039;s the case in Afghanistan, as well.

    If I could add one final item, we&#039;re about to send you the new commander of Fort Huachuca, Brigadier General, promotable, Steve Fogarty, has been a stellar military intelligence chief at Central Command over the last two years, has time in Afghanistan, former special mission unit, intel chief, and so forth, and I think you will really enjoy him and his wife, by the way, once they get out there.


GIFFORDS:

    And we&#039;re looking forward to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, actually you can make up stupidity like this. Because this is made up. Its an urban legend started by someone who is running against Giffords. This was totally debunked by Snopes (<a href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/giffords.asp)" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/giffords.asp)</a>. Do your research, Mike. Its 2010, we have this thing called the internet and its friend google. I&#8217;d expect a BLOGGER to know about them.  But don&#8217;t believe me, here&#8217;s the transcript. In case you wont believe even that, here is the committee hearing webpage. the hearing was on June 16. you can watch the webcast: <a href="http://armedservices.house.gov/hearing_information.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://armedservices.house.gov/hearing_information.shtml</a>. I hope you&#8217;ll publish a correction now that you know the truth!</p>
<p>GIFFORDS:</p>
<p>    Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman.</p>
<p>    General Petraeus, welcome back to committee.</p>
<p>    And, Madam Secretary, thank you, as well.</p>
<p>    Hailing from southern Arizona, I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re staying hydrated. It&#8217;s very important, something that we know out in the desert. And on behalf of the men and women of Fort Huachuca and Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, we just want to thank both of you for your service.</p>
<p>    And, unfortunately, we lost two of our airmen, actually, associated with Davis-Monthan, Senior Airman Benjamin White, who was 24, and also Tech Sergeant Michael Paul Flores, 31, were both based at Davis-Monthan and were part of the Rescue Command. Very sad. Very much brings home, you know, what we&#8217;re asking of our men and women.</p>
<p>    There&#8217;s been a lot of attention back here in the United States on what&#8217;s happening with the BP oil spill. And as we all know, the largest user of energy on the planet is actually the United States Air Force. And the DOD is the largest user of energy in the United States.</p>
<p>    And I really want to commend the work done on behalf of DOD and also what&#8217;s happening in the field with our energy. But it&#8217;s an area that I just really want to focus on, and I know a lot of questions have been asked, but during the last three years, supply lines have increasingly threatened &#8212; have been threatened either by enemy action or through international places.</p>
<p>    And in places like Kandahar, where we have a large presence, we have been plugged into a very unsustainable and really incapable grid system. We know that a major part of the upcoming Kandahar offensive will include some serious repairs and upgrades to the energy system, which will include small-scale solar and hydropower systems, and also some solar-powered streetlights.</p>
<p>    I&#8217;m just curious whether or not there&#8217;s plans to utilize any of those same technologies at our bases around Afghanistan. And wouldn&#8217;t that greatly reduce our need for fuel?</p>
<p>PETRAEUS:</p>
<p>    I pause, because there are a couple of different components to what we&#8217;re trying to do with respect to energy reduction, if you will, and that&#8217;s really what it is about. And there&#8217;s, again, a fairly comprehensive effort in that regard.</p>
<p>    We don&#8217;t have hydropower, obviously, access to that on the bases, but there has been a significant effort which has reduced very substantially, actually, what we&#8217;ve needed for the cooling and heating of our workplaces and living places. And that is sometimes as simple as pumping extra insulation into the roof and walls of these fairly rudimentary temporary buildings that we have, sometimes even the tents.</p>
<p>    And it&#8217;s interesting, because we were exchanging e-mails today with an individual who&#8217;s involved in that effort, and we believe there have been actually billions of dollars of savings in this effort, if you look at what we did in Iraq first in that regard, and have now been pursuing in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>    If I could, I might note that the supply lines actually have worked well &#8212; the lines of communication through Pakistan. Yes, there periodically are attacks, and there was one a week ago, but that followed a period of months and months, if not a year or so, since the last significant attacks. And it&#8217;s much less than 1 percent of all of the cargo that goes in through Pakistan that is affected by these various attacks.</p>
<p>    And we&#8217;re up now to some 70 percent of all supplies, not necessarily all materiel, but all supplies coming through the north through this carefully constructed northern distribution network that we&#8217;ve been able to establish over the course of the last year, in close partnership with U.S. Transportation Command and the State Department, that enables us to bring items through Russia, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and into Afghanistan, and then even through some of the other countries, there are other routes, including one that comes out of Iraq through Turkey and then turns east.</p>
<p>    And we do use solar power in some cases, again, where that provides a benefit to us. We did that in Iraq, as well, by the way, I might point out, quite considerable use of that. And, again, that&#8217;s the case in Afghanistan, as well.</p>
<p>    If I could add one final item, we&#8217;re about to send you the new commander of Fort Huachuca, Brigadier General, promotable, Steve Fogarty, has been a stellar military intelligence chief at Central Command over the last two years, has time in Afghanistan, former special mission unit, intel chief, and so forth, and I think you will really enjoy him and his wife, by the way, once they get out there.</p>
<p>GIFFORDS:</p>
<p>    And we&#8217;re looking forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;m watching the Ms. Universe Pageant by gary rowse</title>
		<link>http://mikerowse.com/?p=1578&#038;cpage=1#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>gary rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikerowse.com/?p=1578#comment-423</guid>
		<description>I agree, this should be evaluated very closely by the emotionally unenvolved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, this should be evaluated very closely by the emotionally unenvolved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This man will save you after a terrorist attack by and_mary</title>
		<link>http://mikerowse.com/?p=1506&#038;cpage=1#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>and_mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikerowse.com/?p=1506#comment-422</guid>
		<description>I would like to exchange links with your site mikerowse.com
Is this possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to exchange links with your site mikerowse.com<br />
Is this possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If you thought postal workers nee doctors was a good idea&#8230; by Low fat diet Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can a Statin Neutralize the Cardiovascular Risk of Unhealthy Dietary Choices?</title>
		<link>http://mikerowse.com/?p=1570&#038;cpage=1#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Low fat diet Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can a Statin Neutralize the Cardiovascular Risk of Unhealthy Dietary Choices?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikerowse.com/?p=1570#comment-420</guid>
		<description>[...] If we suspicion postal workers nee doctors was the great idea… « Mike &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If we suspicion postal workers nee doctors was the great idea… « Mike &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What a huge disappointment by school grants</title>
		<link>http://mikerowse.com/?p=1521&#038;cpage=1#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>school grants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikerowse.com/?p=1521#comment-414</guid>
		<description>My cousin recommended this blog and she was totally right keep up the fantastic work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My cousin recommended this blog and she was totally right keep up the fantastic work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enforcing the law by gary rowse</title>
		<link>http://mikerowse.com/?p=1485&#038;cpage=1#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>gary rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikerowse.com/?p=1485#comment-413</guid>
		<description>WHAT? Enforce the laws as written! Who new that the constitution was part of the rights of citizens?  We are being forced into states rights. It is difficult to write a law that covers everyones situation so why not l;et the states write there own laws using the constitution as the base and don&#039;t let the FEDS ignore or alter the constitution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHAT? Enforce the laws as written! Who new that the constitution was part of the rights of citizens?  We are being forced into states rights. It is difficult to write a law that covers everyones situation so why not l;et the states write there own laws using the constitution as the base and don&#8217;t let the FEDS ignore or alter the constitution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama must have missed this day in college by gary rowse</title>
		<link>http://mikerowse.com/?p=1492&#038;cpage=1#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>gary rowse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikerowse.com/?p=1492#comment-412</guid>
		<description>In MO states rights are floating to the surface like oil on water.  The FEDS have ignored so much of the Constution that it surly is a &quot;Big Brother&quot; situation and states will start fighting back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In MO states rights are floating to the surface like oil on water.  The FEDS have ignored so much of the Constution that it surly is a &#8220;Big Brother&#8221; situation and states will start fighting back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
